In the currently applicable legislation there is really only one reason, the draft for military service to refuse to take effect. Article 4, paragraph 3, sentence 1 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany states: "No one shall be compelled against his conscience to render military service." need for recognition as conscientious objectors, the applicant credibly demonstrate that it would suffer irreparable psychological damage and break the personality, he should have to kill as a soldier, a man.
According to my information, it is next to it, however, in the 70s and 80s of the 20th Century have also been the practice does not draw people approached for military service, though it was had the satisfaction of their express our so-called "free democratic basic order" rejection stated. By the way, recognized community service according to § 26 Civil Service Law are explicitly bound to respect the "free democratic constitutional order." Obviously you put a value on getting protect this fundamental system of people who do not protect them.
Given the last few years constantly evolving demands for constitutional law, at least highly dubious military missions inside there should be I think in future a further reason for refusal: The applicant should be able to refuse military service, if he can not reconcile his conscience to be used potentially as a soldier in his own country against the free democratic basic order can.
One has only to see how today and in the past the police against peaceful demonstrators or other innocent citizens was going on and still going on, just trying to exercise their basic rights to free speech and free development of personality. I personally still quite columns of armored water cannons to mind, remember the optically very strongly of the famous images of China from Tiananmen Square. And although not from any anti-terrorist operations, but by actually peaceful demonstrations or even football games.
For example, the police had Lübeck Years ago, right in the middle of winter at a football game half a dozen water cannons ascended, although at the match was not the slightest threat. However, it would come to an intervention, it would have on innocent civilians at all times were life-threatening, not only by armored vehicles, but also by freezing as a result of indiscriminate gunfire with cold water - minus 7 degrees Celsius. Luckily had the water cannons in the half time break will be deducted from the stadium, probably because the water tanks were frozen.
This may Although at first glance may sound amusing. But we think this scenario but once more! If a deployment of the Bundeswehr inside is possible only once, how long will it then take some time before our paranoid politicians who already see the emergence of the false flags at their rallies as a threat to internal security, loudly calling for protection from set up allegedly possible riots the army to guard the cities and for controlling demonstrations?
is from this point is not it far more tanks in front of Parliament and heavily armed troops that accompany public demonstrations and the citizens their fundamental right to wish to exercise free speech, intimidated by their presence. And who knows, by turning point in this case, the first called on the commander and are the first dead demonstrators in the streets? In our "rule of law" impossible? Nope! Something very similar, we finally had in 1967 ever ...
During approach, therefore, our leaders not only in terms of censorship, but also in terms of anxiety to the people of our highly esteemed Chinese friends and business partners with large steps, I feel it time, the changed situation by changing the practice of the military service bill to , Who as long as there is no such thing as a "free democratic basic order" to protect you. Soldiers or conscripts must have the right to refuse to serve in the armed forces, if there is reason to fear that this could be used within the territory of the Basic Law set out basic rights.
0 comments:
Post a Comment