The new media in 2011 is equal to go well: Mrs. Piel from WDR, the Berlin newspaper interview given http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump .fcgi/2011/0103/m ... in it with "if / then" thinking more or less already announced, as a toll-financed institution charges to try to sell Apps. Can you maybe teach somehow discreetly that even such a public considerations did not do, and for the continued existence of the fee-financed TV institutions can be dangerous? If the TV will not do more on TV, Apps, sell for cash, then one needs no more compulsory subscription for TV. I get this always abstruse considerations before more and more as a discourse of institutional existence of a threat: If television as we know it will disappear as the main medium, what do you do with their and their extended structure much energy (money) pulling programming networks and program providers? reinterpretation?
redefinition?
past cheating?
restructuring?
Colonial territorial expansion? has handled the way you handled economically once the GDR: or at least better? Also Rüdiger Suchsland operates on Telepolis continue "ER-watching", this time using the example of the ZDF and its ratio, which is a documentary or a documentary or should be - as well as the budget shifts to escape the ultimate high-quality program, the substance, because with wants to play on the same program budget instead of a now four channels on its own: http://www.heise.de/tp/blogs/6/149014 I mean, what have become conditions if the columnists are now calling constantly towards ER: "Not a step further" The NYT has meanwhile drawn the economic Cinema balance of U.S. movies of 2010 and came to the conclusion that documentary films in American cinema (again) on Marginalitätsniveau are dropped (even there, so the big trend "buffo") - that although the distribution of documentaries shifted more to video-on-demand models, Funchal, is not necessarily only in the Web, "walled gardens of the Internet", but also cable television providers, particularly as new promotional models for Docs as SnagFilms with the Summerfest show up in the online sector: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/business/media/03docs.html http://www.snagfilms.com/films/press/snagfilms_summerfest_2010/
JP .
redefinition?
past cheating?
restructuring?
Colonial territorial expansion? has handled the way you handled economically once the GDR: or at least better? Also Rüdiger Suchsland operates on Telepolis continue "ER-watching", this time using the example of the ZDF and its ratio, which is a documentary or a documentary or should be - as well as the budget shifts to escape the ultimate high-quality program, the substance, because with wants to play on the same program budget instead of a now four channels on its own: http://www.heise.de/tp/blogs/6/149014 I mean, what have become conditions if the columnists are now calling constantly towards ER: "Not a step further" The NYT has meanwhile drawn the economic Cinema balance of U.S. movies of 2010 and came to the conclusion that documentary films in American cinema (again) on Marginalitätsniveau are dropped (even there, so the big trend "buffo") - that although the distribution of documentaries shifted more to video-on-demand models, Funchal, is not necessarily only in the Web, "walled gardens of the Internet", but also cable television providers, particularly as new promotional models for Docs as SnagFilms with the Summerfest show up in the online sector: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/business/media/03docs.html http://www.snagfilms.com/films/press/snagfilms_summerfest_2010/
JP .
0 comments:
Post a Comment